[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKueq=a6Y_2YmSDOa-VTCW9jwYPiXq94125EAMoZ5Y6-ypA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 10:20:21 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 9:54 AM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> I just tried arm64 with your patch set. CFI crash still happened:
>
> CFI failure at tcp_ack+0xe74/0x13cc (target: bpf__tcp_congestion_ops_in_ack_event+0x0/0x78; expected type: 0x64424
> 87a)
This one should fixed by the other series I posted earlier:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250722205357.3347626-5-samitolvanen@google.com/
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists