[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUM=1paD_3morMnz_6m8WWE8pmN0sC27xPanbp3FWYtjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 17:30:04 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] perf annotate: Simplify width calculation in annotation_line__write()
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 12:38 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The width is updated after each part is printed. It can skip the output
> processing if the total printed size is bigger than the width.
>
> No function changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index c21152710148b68c..d69e406c1bc289cd 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -1993,6 +1993,7 @@ void annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes
> symbol_conf.show_nr_samples ? "Samples" : "Percent");
> }
> }
> + width -= pcnt_width;
>
> if (notes->branch) {
> if (al->cycles && al->cycles->ipc)
> @@ -2056,11 +2057,12 @@ void annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes
> obj__printf(obj, "%*s", ANNOTATION__AVG_IPC_WIDTH, bf);
> }
> }
> + width -= cycles_width;
>
> obj__printf(obj, " ");
>
> if (!*al->line)
> - obj__printf(obj, "%-*s", width - pcnt_width - cycles_width, " ");
> + obj__printf(obj, "%-*s", width, " ");
> else if (al->offset == -1) {
> if (al->line_nr && annotate_opts.show_linenr)
> printed = scnprintf(bf, sizeof(bf), "%-*d ",
> @@ -2069,7 +2071,7 @@ void annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes
> printed = scnprintf(bf, sizeof(bf), "%-*s ",
> notes->src->widths.addr, " ");
> obj__printf(obj, bf);
> - obj__printf(obj, "%-*s", width - printed - pcnt_width - cycles_width + 1, al->line);
> + obj__printf(obj, "%-*s", width - printed + 1, al->line);
This doesn't seem to line up with the commit message, should width be
updated prior to this call?
> } else {
> u64 addr = al->offset;
> int color = -1;
> @@ -2112,9 +2114,11 @@ void annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes
> if (change_color)
> obj__set_color(obj, color);
>
> + width -= printed + 3;
nit: For constants that like '+3' here and '+1' it'd be nice for a
comment just to say where the adjustment comes from.
Thanks,
Ian
> +
> disasm_line__write(disasm_line(al), notes, obj, bf, sizeof(bf), obj__printf, obj__write_graph);
>
> - obj__printf(obj, "%-*s", width - pcnt_width - cycles_width - 3 - printed, bf);
> + obj__printf(obj, "%-*s", width, bf);
>
> (void)apd;
> }
> --
> 2.50.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists