[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIVNj1DLab18eArC@sultan-box>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 14:50:07 -0700
From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
To: "Du, Bin" <bin.du@....com>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pratap.nirujogi@....com, benjamin.chan@....com, king.li@....com,
gjorgji.rosikopulos@....com, Phil.Jawich@....com,
Dominic.Antony@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] media: platform: amd: isp4 video node and buffers
handling added
On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 02:41:41PM -0700, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 05:22:41PM +0800, Du, Bin wrote:
> > > > + dev_warn(buf->dev, "ignore buffer free, refcount %u > 0",
> > > > + refcount_read(&buf->refcount));
> > >
> > > This refcount_read() is a possible use-after-free because `buf` is accessed
> > > after isp4vid_vb2_put() puts its reference to `buf`. So something else could put
> > > the last reference to `buf` and free it after this refcount dec but before the
> > > refcount_read(). Maybe just remove this dev_warn() entirely?
> > >
> > The warning is important to debug mem related issue, plan to keep it but
> > without accessing buf or buf->refcount here. Do you think it acceptible?
>
> Yes, that sounds good. So something like this:
> `dev_warn(buf->dev, "ignore buffer free, refcount > 0");`
Sorry, to fix the dev_warn() we need to make a copy of buf->dev first:
--- a/drivers/media/platform/amd/isp4/isp4_video.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/amd/isp4/isp4_video.c
@@ -584,8 +584,9 @@ static void isp4vid_vb2_put(void *buf_priv)
{
struct isp4vid_vb2_buf *buf = (struct isp4vid_vb2_buf *)buf_priv;
struct amdgpu_bo *bo = (struct amdgpu_bo *)buf->bo;
+ struct device *dev = buf->dev;
- dev_dbg(buf->dev,
+ dev_dbg(dev,
"release isp user bo 0x%llx size %ld refcount %d is_expbuf %d",
buf->gpu_addr, buf->size,
buf->refcount.refs.counter, buf->is_expbuf);
@@ -601,8 +602,7 @@ static void isp4vid_vb2_put(void *buf_priv)
kfree(buf);
buf = NULL;
} else {
- dev_warn(buf->dev, "ignore buffer free, refcount %u > 0",
- refcount_read(&buf->refcount));
+ dev_warn(dev, "ignore buffer free, refcount > 0\n");
}
}
--
Sultan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists