lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3eff304-8dd3-418d-afa9-eaf91020c535@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 19:29:52 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>, puranjay@...nel.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman
 <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
 Peilin Ye <yepeilin@...gle.com>, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
 lkmm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 1/1] powerpc64/bpf: Add jit support for
 load_acquire and store_release

On 7/24/25 12:27 PM, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for the patch. I applied the patch and tested it.
> 
> Before this patch:
> 
> # ./test_progs -a \
>    verifier_load_acquire,verifier_store_release,atomics
> #11/1    atomics/add:OK
> #11/2    atomics/sub:OK
> #11/3    atomics/and:OK
> #11/4    atomics/or:OK
> #11/5    atomics/xor:OK
> #11/6    atomics/cmpxchg:OK
> #11/7    atomics/xchg:OK
> #11      atomics:OK
> #528/1   verifier_load_acquire/Clang version < 18, ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS not defined, and/or JIT doesn't support load-acquire, use a dummy test:OK
> #528     verifier_load_acquire:OK
> #565/1   verifier_store_release/Clang version < 18, ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS not defined, and/or JIT doesn't support store-release, use a dummy test:OK
> #565     verifier_store_release:OK
> Summary: 3/9 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> After this patch:
> 
> # ./test_progs -a \
>    verifier_load_acquire,verifier_store_release,atomics
> #11/1    atomics/add:OK
> #11/2    atomics/sub:OK
> #11/3    atomics/and:OK
> #11/4    atomics/or:OK
> #11/5    atomics/xor:OK
> #11/6    atomics/cmpxchg:OK
> #11/7    atomics/xchg:OK
> #11      atomics:OK
> #529/1   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 8-bit:OK
> #529/2   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 8-bit @unpriv:OK
> #529/3   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 16-bit:OK
> #529/4   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 16-bit @unpriv:OK
> #529/5   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 32-bit:OK
> #529/6   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 32-bit @unpriv:OK
> #529/7   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 64-bit:OK
> #529/8   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 64-bit @unpriv:OK
> #529/9   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with uninitialized src_reg:OK
> #529/10  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with uninitialized src_reg @unpriv:OK
> #529/11  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with non-pointer src_reg:OK
> #529/12  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with non-pointer src_reg @unpriv:OK
> #529/13  verifier_load_acquire/misaligned load-acquire:OK
> #529/14  verifier_load_acquire/misaligned load-acquire @unpriv:OK
> #529/15  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from ctx pointer:OK
> #529/16  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from ctx pointer @unpriv:OK
> #529/17  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with invalid register R15:OK
> #529/18  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with invalid register R15 @unpriv:OK
> #529/19  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from pkt pointer:OK
> #529/20  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from flow_keys pointer:OK
> #529/21  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from sock pointer:OK
> #529     verifier_load_acquire:OK
> #566/1   verifier_store_release/store-release, 8-bit:OK
> #566/2   verifier_store_release/store-release, 8-bit @unpriv:OK
> #566/3   verifier_store_release/store-release, 16-bit:OK
> #566/4   verifier_store_release/store-release, 16-bit @unpriv:OK
> #566/5   verifier_store_release/store-release, 32-bit:OK
> #566/6   verifier_store_release/store-release, 32-bit @unpriv:OK
> #566/7   verifier_store_release/store-release, 64-bit:OK
> #566/8   verifier_store_release/store-release, 64-bit @unpriv:OK
> #566/9   verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized src_reg:OK
> #566/10  verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized src_reg @unpriv:OK
> #566/11  verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized dst_reg:OK
> #566/12  verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized dst_reg @unpriv:OK
> #566/13  verifier_store_release/store-release with non-pointer dst_reg:OK
> #566/14  verifier_store_release/store-release with non-pointer dst_reg @unpriv:OK
> #566/15  verifier_store_release/misaligned store-release:OK
> #566/16  verifier_store_release/misaligned store-release @unpriv:OK
> #566/17  verifier_store_release/store-release to ctx pointer:OK
> #566/18  verifier_store_release/store-release to ctx pointer @unpriv:OK
> #566/19  verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to stack:OK
> #566/20  verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to stack @unpriv:OK
> #566/21  verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to map:OK
> #566/22  verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to map @unpriv:OK
> #566/23  verifier_store_release/store-release with invalid register R15:OK
> #566/24  verifier_store_release/store-release with invalid register R15 @unpriv:OK
> #566/25  verifier_store_release/store-release to pkt pointer:OK
> #566/26  verifier_store_release/store-release to flow_keys pointer:OK
> #566/27  verifier_store_release/store-release to sock pointer:OK
> #566     verifier_store_release:OK
> Summary: 3/55 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> Tested-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>

Michael/Madhavan, I presume you'll pick this patch up?

Thanks,
Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ