[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3eff304-8dd3-418d-afa9-eaf91020c535@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 19:29:52 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>, puranjay@...nel.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman
<eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin@...gle.com>, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
lkmm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 1/1] powerpc64/bpf: Add jit support for
load_acquire and store_release
On 7/24/25 12:27 PM, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for the patch. I applied the patch and tested it.
>
> Before this patch:
>
> # ./test_progs -a \
> verifier_load_acquire,verifier_store_release,atomics
> #11/1 atomics/add:OK
> #11/2 atomics/sub:OK
> #11/3 atomics/and:OK
> #11/4 atomics/or:OK
> #11/5 atomics/xor:OK
> #11/6 atomics/cmpxchg:OK
> #11/7 atomics/xchg:OK
> #11 atomics:OK
> #528/1 verifier_load_acquire/Clang version < 18, ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS not defined, and/or JIT doesn't support load-acquire, use a dummy test:OK
> #528 verifier_load_acquire:OK
> #565/1 verifier_store_release/Clang version < 18, ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS not defined, and/or JIT doesn't support store-release, use a dummy test:OK
> #565 verifier_store_release:OK
> Summary: 3/9 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> After this patch:
>
> # ./test_progs -a \
> verifier_load_acquire,verifier_store_release,atomics
> #11/1 atomics/add:OK
> #11/2 atomics/sub:OK
> #11/3 atomics/and:OK
> #11/4 atomics/or:OK
> #11/5 atomics/xor:OK
> #11/6 atomics/cmpxchg:OK
> #11/7 atomics/xchg:OK
> #11 atomics:OK
> #529/1 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 8-bit:OK
> #529/2 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 8-bit @unpriv:OK
> #529/3 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 16-bit:OK
> #529/4 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 16-bit @unpriv:OK
> #529/5 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 32-bit:OK
> #529/6 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 32-bit @unpriv:OK
> #529/7 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 64-bit:OK
> #529/8 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 64-bit @unpriv:OK
> #529/9 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with uninitialized src_reg:OK
> #529/10 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with uninitialized src_reg @unpriv:OK
> #529/11 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with non-pointer src_reg:OK
> #529/12 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with non-pointer src_reg @unpriv:OK
> #529/13 verifier_load_acquire/misaligned load-acquire:OK
> #529/14 verifier_load_acquire/misaligned load-acquire @unpriv:OK
> #529/15 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from ctx pointer:OK
> #529/16 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from ctx pointer @unpriv:OK
> #529/17 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with invalid register R15:OK
> #529/18 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with invalid register R15 @unpriv:OK
> #529/19 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from pkt pointer:OK
> #529/20 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from flow_keys pointer:OK
> #529/21 verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from sock pointer:OK
> #529 verifier_load_acquire:OK
> #566/1 verifier_store_release/store-release, 8-bit:OK
> #566/2 verifier_store_release/store-release, 8-bit @unpriv:OK
> #566/3 verifier_store_release/store-release, 16-bit:OK
> #566/4 verifier_store_release/store-release, 16-bit @unpriv:OK
> #566/5 verifier_store_release/store-release, 32-bit:OK
> #566/6 verifier_store_release/store-release, 32-bit @unpriv:OK
> #566/7 verifier_store_release/store-release, 64-bit:OK
> #566/8 verifier_store_release/store-release, 64-bit @unpriv:OK
> #566/9 verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized src_reg:OK
> #566/10 verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized src_reg @unpriv:OK
> #566/11 verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized dst_reg:OK
> #566/12 verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized dst_reg @unpriv:OK
> #566/13 verifier_store_release/store-release with non-pointer dst_reg:OK
> #566/14 verifier_store_release/store-release with non-pointer dst_reg @unpriv:OK
> #566/15 verifier_store_release/misaligned store-release:OK
> #566/16 verifier_store_release/misaligned store-release @unpriv:OK
> #566/17 verifier_store_release/store-release to ctx pointer:OK
> #566/18 verifier_store_release/store-release to ctx pointer @unpriv:OK
> #566/19 verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to stack:OK
> #566/20 verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to stack @unpriv:OK
> #566/21 verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to map:OK
> #566/22 verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to map @unpriv:OK
> #566/23 verifier_store_release/store-release with invalid register R15:OK
> #566/24 verifier_store_release/store-release with invalid register R15 @unpriv:OK
> #566/25 verifier_store_release/store-release to pkt pointer:OK
> #566/26 verifier_store_release/store-release to flow_keys pointer:OK
> #566/27 verifier_store_release/store-release to sock pointer:OK
> #566 verifier_store_release:OK
> Summary: 3/55 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> Tested-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
Michael/Madhavan, I presume you'll pick this patch up?
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists