[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIevIuMDA5R8igmi@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 19:10:58 +0200
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Richard Acayan <mailingradian@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 24/24] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Describe GPU_CC
power plumbing requirements
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>
> A number of power rails must be powered on in order for GPU_CC to
> function. Ensure that's conveyed to the OS.
>
> Fixes: 721e38301b79 ("arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add gpu support")
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> index 5e9a8fa3cf96468b12775f91192cbd779d5ce946..6620517fbb0f3ed715c4901ec53dcbc6235be88f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> @@ -3928,6 +3928,12 @@ gpucc: clock-controller@...0000 {
> clocks = <&bi_tcxo_div2>,
> <&gcc GCC_GPU_GPLL0_CPH_CLK_SRC>,
> <&gcc GCC_GPU_GPLL0_DIV_CPH_CLK_SRC>;
> +
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_CX>,
> + <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MX>,
> + <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_GFX>,
> + <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_GMXC>;
> +
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>
To repeat your own message from a couple of months back [1]:
> You shouldn't be messing with VDD_GFX on platforms with a GMU.
>
> Parts of the clock controller are backed by one of the MX rails,
> with some logic depending on CX/GFX, but handling of the latter is
> fully deferred to the GMU firmware.
>
> Konrad
Please describe somewhere in the cover letter or the individual patches
how this relates to the responsibilities of the GMU. I searched for
"GMU" in the patch series and couldn't find any note about this.
Also: How much is a plain "power on" votes (without a corresponding
"required-opps") really worth nowadays? An arbitrary low voltage level
on those rails won't be sufficient to make the GPU_CC actually
"function". Do you need "required-opps" here? In the videocc/camcc case
we have those.
Thanks,
Stephan
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/2dae7d88-4b3e-452f-9555-05f10b42dabc@oss.qualcomm.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists