[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e160d91-3768-4fd7-b9d9-3c12af329fdf@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:59:58 +0530
From: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: document the Glymur
Global Clock Controller
On 7/25/2025 1:15 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 02:59:14PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Add device tree bindings for the Glymur Global Clock Controller to provide
>> a standardized way of describing the clock controller's properties and
>> behavior.
>
> That's not a correct reason to add bindings. Why would we care about
> standardized way of describing clock controller properties for Glymur?
>
> No, explain what is the hardware you are here documenting.
Yes, will fix in the next patch.
--
Thanks,
Taniya Das
Powered by blists - more mailing lists