[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a07b9468-67aa-4e22-86af-817bb3295d1b@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:42:40 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Dishank Jogi <jogidishank503@...il.com>, geert@...ux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
darshanrathod475@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zorro: fix checkpatch error by avoiding assignment in
if-statement.
Le 28/07/2025 à 11:34, Dishank Jogi a écrit :
> These changes improve code readability and bring the file
> in line with the Linux kernel coding style.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dishank Jogi <jogidishank503@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/zorro/gen-devlist.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/zorro/gen-devlist.c b/drivers/zorro/gen-devlist.c
> index e325c5ce995b..ff4515e02409 100644
> --- a/drivers/zorro/gen-devlist.c
> +++ b/drivers/zorro/gen-devlist.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ main(void)
>
> while (fgets(line, sizeof(line)-1, stdin)) {
> lino++;
> - if ((c = strchr(line, '\n')))
> + c = strchr(line, '\n')
Looks like a trailing ; is missing.
Was this patch compile-tested?
No change is trivial, even if they look so.
Please always compile test your changes.
CJ
> + if (c)
> *c = 0;
> if (!line[0] || line[0] == '#')
> continue;
> @@ -68,7 +69,8 @@ main(void)
> fprintf(devf, "\tPRODUCT(%s,%s,\"", manuf, line+1);
> pq(devf, c);
> fputs("\")\n", devf);
> - } else goto err;
> + } else
> + goto err;
> break;
> default:
> goto err;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists