[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3f191f1-1b83-4284-b164-64c5b3e3fd43@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:19:44 +0800
From: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov
<lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com, konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com,
fange.zhang@....qualcomm.com, quic_lliu6@...cinc.com,
quic_yongmou@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/msm/dp: Add DisplayPort support for QCS615
On 7/22/2025 5:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/07/2025 09:22, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
>> The Qualcomm QCS615 platform comes with a DisplayPort controller use the
>> same base offset as sc7180. add support for this in DP driver.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 },
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
>
> So devices are compatible? Why are you adding this entry instead of
> expressing compatibility?
SM6150 uses the same DP driver configuration as SC7180 via msm_dp_desc_sc7180, but its hardware lacks features like HBR3.
Implicitly relying on msm_dp_desc_sc7180 may cause compatibility issues for SM6150 if the msm_dp_desc is extended in the future.
This is consistent with how other SoCs like SM8350 are handled.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists