[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nja2lfh3vnmsfvvvl4stxm4n433ktfeftdpb6g6criwslev2bj@ksqx3y7umo3c>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:12:11 +0100
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7124: fix channel lookup in syscalib
functions
On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 01:31:35PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 11:28:48 -0500
> David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> > Fix possible incorrect channel lookup in the syscalib functions by using
> > the correct channel address instead of the channel number.
> >
> > In the ad7124 driver, the channel field of struct iio_chan_spec is the
> > input pin number of the positive input of the channel. This can be, but
> > is not always the same as the index in the channels array. The correct
> > index in the channels array is stored in the address field (and also
> > scan_index). We use the address field to perform the correct lookup.
> >
> > Fixes: 47036a03a303 ("iio: adc: ad7124: Implement internal calibration at probe time")
> > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> Seems fine to me and i'll queue it up, but I would welcome another set of
> eyes on this one.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
The fix seems valid to me:
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> > index 9808df2e92424283a86e9c105492c7447d071e44..4d8c6bafd1c3171054c72a0d2b13d6b1afc4e51a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> > @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ enum {
> > static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan_spec *chan)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &st->sd.spi->dev;
> > - struct ad7124_channel *ch = &st->channels[chan->channel];
> > + struct ad7124_channel *ch = &st->channels[chan->address];
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (ch->syscalib_mode == AD7124_SYSCALIB_ZERO_SCALE) {
> > @@ -865,8 +865,8 @@ static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "offset for channel %d after zero-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> > - chan->channel, ch->cfg.calibration_offset);
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "offset for channel %lu after zero-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> > + chan->address, ch->cfg.calibration_offset);
> > } else {
> > ch->cfg.calibration_gain = st->gain_default;
> >
> > @@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "gain for channel %d after full-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> > - chan->channel, ch->cfg.calibration_gain);
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "gain for channel %lu after full-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> > + chan->address, ch->cfg.calibration_gain);
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ static int ad7124_set_syscalib_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > {
> > struct ad7124_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >
> > - st->channels[chan->channel].syscalib_mode = mode;
> > + st->channels[chan->address].syscalib_mode = mode;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static int ad7124_get_syscalib_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > {
> > struct ad7124_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >
> > - return st->channels[chan->channel].syscalib_mode;
> > + return st->channels[chan->address].syscalib_mode;
> > }
> >
> > static const struct iio_enum ad7124_syscalib_mode_enum = {
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: e4d9886ad25adae72f38f2b12f41649b101581ae
> > change-id: 20250726-iio-adc-ad7124-fix-channel-lookup-in-syscalib-e28c933ead2a
> >
> > Best regards,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists