[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIdNu7wwsbnVGbAN@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 13:15:23 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: pratyush@...nel.org, jasonmiu@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com,
changyuanl@...gle.com, dmatlack@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
corbet@....net, rdunlap@...radead.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, kanie@...ux.alibaba.com,
ojeda@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, yoann.congal@...le.fr,
mmaurer@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, chenridong@...wei.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, mark.rutland@....com, jannh@...gle.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
joel.granados@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
anna.schumaker@...cle.com, song@...nel.org, zhangguopeng@...inos.cn,
linux@...ssschuh.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org,
bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, yesanishhere@...il.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, leon@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, wagi@...nel.org, djeffery@...hat.com,
stuart.w.hayes@...il.com, ptyadav@...zon.de, lennart@...ttering.net,
brauner@...nel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
ajayachandra@...dia.com, jgg@...dia.com, parav@...dia.com,
leonro@...dia.com, witu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/32] kho: warn if KHO is disabled due to an error
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 02:46:16PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> During boot scratch area is allocated based on command line
> parameters or auto calculated. However, scratch area may fail
> to allocate, and in that case KHO is disabled. Currently,
> no warning is printed that KHO is disabled, which makes it
> confusing for the end user to figure out why KHO is not
> available. Add the missing warning message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> ---
> kernel/kexec_handover.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> index 1ff6b242f98c..368e23db0a17 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> @@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ static void __init kho_reserve_scratch(void)
> err_free_scratch_desc:
> memblock_free(kho_scratch, kho_scratch_cnt * sizeof(*kho_scratch));
> err_disable_kho:
> + pr_warn("Failed to reserve scratch area, disabling kexec handover\n");
> kho_enable = false;
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists