[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c0837b5-b3d3-48c2-a028-97cfcd1ec4fe@web.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 20:35:53 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Pan Chuang <panchuang@...o.com>, Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/1] genirq/devres: Add dev_err_probe() in
devm_request_threaded_irq() and devm_request_any_context_irq()
…
> This patch implements a standardized error reporting approach[1]:
…
Would it become helpful to move any information from the cover letter
to the (single) patch?
How do you think about to avoid the presentation of duplicate data?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists