lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d359b20348c17c5426cca6937a96a739e9f1a7dc.camel@ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:12:24 +0000
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
To: "frank.li@...o.com" <frank.li@...o.com>,
        "glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de"
	<glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        "slava@...eyko.com" <slava@...eyko.com>
CC: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:  [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update location of hfs&hfsplus trees

On Tue, 2025-07-29 at 10:01 -0600, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Update it at MAINTAINERS file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 7a4e63bacaa4..48b25f1e2c01 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -10659,6 +10659,7 @@ M:	John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
>  M:	Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
>  L:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
>  S:	Maintained
> +T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vdubeyko/hfs.git
>  F:	Documentation/filesystems/hfs.rst
>  F:	fs/hfs/
>  
> @@ -10668,6 +10669,7 @@ M:	John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
>  M:	Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
>  L:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
>  S:	Maintained
> +T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vdubeyko/hfs.git
>  F:	Documentation/filesystems/hfsplus.rst
>  F:	fs/hfsplus/
>  

Makes sense. We need to update it here.

By the way, we have also [1]. I am collecting patches there at first too and we
can use it for the initial testing. Also, we have very simple bug tracking
system [2] and I am tracking the known and opened issues there. Should we add
this information too?

We have empty WiKi there, but we could add the information there too.

Thanks,
Slava.

[1] https://github.com/hfs-linux-kernel/hfs-linux-kernel
[2] https://github.com/hfs-linux-kernel/hfs-linux-kernel/issues

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ