[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_341B732549BA50BB6733349E621B0D4B7A08@qq.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 13:32:26 +0800
From: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: eadavis@...com,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
linkinjeon@...nel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sj1557.seo@...sung.com,
syzbot+d3c29ed63db6ddf8406e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Prevent the race of read/write the FAT16 and FAT32 entry
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 05:53:23 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>FAT12 problem is that FAT entries being accessed there are 12-bit, packed in
>pairs into an array of 3-byte values. Have you actually read what the functions
I learned it. I didn't really understand this code, but after your hint,
I understood that the 12-bit entry FAT12 has 3 bytes, and cacheline will
not be an integer multiple of 3. Finally, the entry with fat12 may exceed
the judgment of cacheline.
>are doing? There we *must* serialize the access to bytes that have 4 bits
>from one entry and 4 from another - there's no such thing as atomically
>update half a byte; it has to be read, modified and stored back. If two
>threads try to do that to upper and lower halves of the same byte at the
>same time, the value will be corrupted.
I will change the fix to READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE later.
BR,
Edward
Powered by blists - more mailing lists