linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 29 (BACKLIGHT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6c481bb-e854-405e-a428-90301789fe20@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 01:32:13 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Duje Mihanović <duje.mihanovic@...le.hr>,
 Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 29 (BACKLIGHT_KTD2801)



On 7/28/25 10:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20250728:
> 

on ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386, when
# CONFIG_GPIOLIB is not set

WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LEDS_EXPRESSWIRE
  Depends on [n]: GPIOLIB [=n] || NEW_LEDS [=y] && GPIOLIB [=n]
  Selected by [y]:
  - BACKLIGHT_KTD2801 [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE [=y]


so BACKLIGHT_KTD2801 should:
	depends on GPIOLIB

Also, in drivers/leds/Kconfig, does it need duplicate entries for this?
Can't the second entry be removed?
(asking since Duje made both entries)

config LEDS_EXPRESSWIRE
	bool
	depends on GPIOLIB


Thanks.


-- 
~Randy