[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7445b3d4-0e88-40e5-bcbd-8ea60c35d5bb@rock-chips.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 16:31:27 +0800
From: Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: andrzej.hajda@...el.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
jingoohan1@...il.com, inki.dae@...sung.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, krzk@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
hjc@...k-chips.com, heiko@...ech.de, andy.yan@...k-chips.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
dianders@...omium.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/14] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add
&analogix_dp_plat_data.bridge
Hi Maxime,
On 2025/7/29 15:30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 04:02:54PM +0800, Damon Ding wrote:
>> In order to move the parnel/bridge parsing and attachmenet to the
>> Analogix side, add component struct drm_bridge *bridge to platform
>> data struct analogix_dp_plat_data.
>>
>> The movemenet makes sense because the panel/bridge should logically
>> be positioned behind the Analogix bridge in the display pipeline.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com>
>> ---
>> include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h b/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h
>> index cf17646c1310..15cb6b706e9f 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static inline bool is_rockchip(enum analogix_dp_devtype type)
>> struct analogix_dp_plat_data {
>> enum analogix_dp_devtype dev_type;
>> struct drm_panel *panel;
>> + struct drm_bridge *bridge;
>> struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>> struct drm_connector *connector;
>> bool skip_connector;
>
> So it's not the analogix_dp bridge, but the bridge after that if any?
>
> You should probably change it to next_bridge to avoid any confusion.
>
Yes, &analogix_dp_plat_data.bridge is intended to be the next bridge
after analogix_dp bridge.
I will rename it to &analogix_dp_plat_data.next_bridge as suggested and
update it in the next version.
Best regards,
Damon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists