[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250729083954.GE402218@unreal>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:39:54 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] vfio/pci: Share the core device pointer while
invoking feature functions
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 02:55:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:00:10 +0300
> Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>
> >
> > There is no need to share the main device pointer (struct vfio_device *)
> > with all the feature functions as they only need the core device
> > pointer. Therefore, extract the core device pointer once in the
> > caller (vfio_pci_core_ioctl_feature) and share it instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
<...>
> > static int vfio_pci_core_pm_entry_with_wakeup(
> > - struct vfio_device *device, u32 flags,
> > + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u32 flags,
> > struct vfio_device_low_power_entry_with_wakeup __user *arg,
> > size_t argsz)
>
> I'm tempted to fix the line wrapping here, but I think this patch
> stands on its own. Even if it's rather trivial, it makes sense to
> consolidate and standardize on the vfio_pci_core_device getting passed
> around within vfio_pci_core.c. Any reason not to split this off?
No problem, I will send it separately after merge window ends.
Thanks
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists