linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 29 (BACKLIGHT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5002743.GXAFRqVoOG@radijator>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:18:16 +0200
From: Duje Mihanović <duje@...emihanovic.xyz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 29 (BACKLIGHT_KTD2801)

On Tuesday, 29 July 2025 10:32:13 Central European Summer Time Randy Dunlap 
wrote:
> so BACKLIGHT_KTD2801 should:
> 	depends on GPIOLIB

Sounds good to me.

> Also, in drivers/leds/Kconfig, does it need duplicate entries for this?
> Can't the second entry be removed?
> (asking since Duje made both entries)

That's an oversight on my end, and as such the second one (the one inside the 
"if NEW_LEDS" block) should be removed.

Would you like me to send a patch to fix these?

Regards,
-- 
Duje