[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3c004a9-dba9-48b5-9930-979053d0a32c@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 13:01:31 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com, kernel@....qualcomm.com,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>
Cc: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaraman.narayanamurthy@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] leds: flash: leds-qcom-flash: update torch current
clamp setting
On 7/29/25 6:51 AM, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
>
> There is a register to clamp the flash current per LED channel when
> safety timer is disabled. It needs to be updated according to the
> maximum torch LED current setting to ensure the torch current won't
> be clamped unexpectedly.
>
> Fixes: 96a2e242a5dc ("leds: flash: Add driver to support flash LED module in QCOM PMICs")
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
I'd prefer the regfield change was done in a separate commit,
but it's not groundbreaking so I don't mind that much
[...]
> struct qcom_flash_led {
> @@ -702,6 +706,7 @@ static int qcom_flash_register_led_device(struct device *dev,
> u32 current_ua, timeout_us;
> u32 channels[4];
> int i, rc, count;
> + u8 torch_clamp;
>
> count = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "led-sources");
> if (count <= 0) {
> @@ -751,6 +756,12 @@ static int qcom_flash_register_led_device(struct device *dev,
> current_ua = min_t(u32, current_ua, TORCH_CURRENT_MAX_UA * led->chan_count);
> led->max_torch_current_ma = current_ua / UA_PER_MA;
>
> + torch_clamp = (current_ua / led->chan_count) / TORCH_IRES_UA;
> + if (torch_clamp != 0)
> + torch_clamp--;
> +
> + flash_data->torch_clamp = max_t(u8, flash_data->torch_clamp, torch_clamp);
Please confirm if I understand correctly, we may have N flash LEDs
connected, and this additional safety hardware can only compare any
individual LED's current draw against a single maximum value, which
we're setting here
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists