[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6aeb9c5d-7c3f-4c0c-989f-df309267ffbe@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:14:12 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: add test for SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU quarantine
skipping
On 7/28/25 17:25, Jann Horn wrote:
> Verify that KASAN does not quarantine objects in SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slabs
> if CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG is off.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> ---
> Feel free to either take this as a separate commit or squash it into the
> preceding "[PATCH] kasan: skip quarantine if object is still accessible
> under RCU".
>
> I tested this by running KASAN kunit tests for x86-64 with KASAN
> and tracing manually enabled; there are two failing tests but those
> seem unrelated (kasan_memchr is unexpectedly not detecting some
> accesses, and kasan_strings is also failing).
> ---
> mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
> index 5f922dd38ffa..15d3d82041bf 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
> @@ -1073,6 +1073,41 @@ static void kmem_cache_rcu_uaf(struct kunit *test)
> kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Check that SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU objects are immediately reused when
> + * CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG is off, and stay at the same address.
> + */
> +static void kmem_cache_rcu_reuse(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + char *p, *p2;
> + struct kmem_cache *cache;
> +
> + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_OFF(test, CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG);
> +
> + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", 16, 0, SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU,
> + NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
Hmm is there anything inherent in kunit that keeps the test pinned to the
same cpu? Otherwise I think you'll need here
migrate_disable();
> + p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!p) {
> + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
> + p2 = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
and here (or later)
migrate_enable();
> + if (!p2) {
> + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> + return;
> + }
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, p, p2);
Otherwise the cpu slab caching of SLUB and a migration could mean this won't
hold as you'll get object from another slab.
> + kmem_cache_free(cache, p2);
> + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> +}
> +
> static void kmem_cache_double_destroy(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct kmem_cache *cache;
> @@ -2098,6 +2133,7 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_double_free),
> KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_invalid_free),
> KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_rcu_uaf),
> + KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_rcu_reuse),
> KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_double_destroy),
> KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_accounted),
> KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_bulk),
>
> ---
> base-commit: 0df7d6c9705b283d5b71ee0ae86ead05bd3a55a9
> change-id: 20250728-kasan-tsbrcu-noquarantine-test-5c723367e056
> prerequisite-change-id: 20250723-kasan-tsbrcu-noquarantine-e207bb990e24:v1
> prerequisite-patch-id: 4fab9d3a121bfcaacc32a40f606b7c04e0c6fdd0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists