[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aee17767-b8be-42ff-b00c-92f9aa46a521@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 09:17:01 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux trace kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Namhyung Kim
<namhyung@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: tracing: Add documentation about eprobes
Hi,
>>> +From the source code, the sys_openat() has:
>>> +::
>>> +
>>> + int sys_openat(int dirfd, const char *path, int flags, mode_t mode)
>>> + {
>>> + return my_syscall4(__NR_openat, dirfd, path, flags, mode);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +The path is the second parameter, and that is what is wanted.
>>
>> s/wanted/want/
>
> Really? That sounds funny to me:
>
> The path is the second parameter and that is what is want.
>
> ??
Yeah, I don't know how I did that. Sorry.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists