linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86/cpu/intel: Fix the constant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAO9wTFi6QZoZk2+TM--SeJLUsrYZXLeWkrfh1URXvRB=yWtwig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:57:42 +0530
From: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@...il.com>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, 
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, darwi@...utronix.de, 
	peterz@...radead.org, ravi.bangoria@....com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, 
	linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/cpu/intel: Fix the constant_tsc model check for
 Pentium 4s

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 at 21:03, Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/30/2025 7:58 AM, Suchit Karunakaran wrote:
>
> > Hi Sohil. Thanks for reviewing it. Should I send a new version of the
> > patch fixing the minor issues with the reviewed by tag?
>
> Yes please, I think one more revision would be helpful and reduce manual
> steps for the maintainers. (Likely after the merge window has closed).
>
> Also, please try to trim your responses to only include the essential
> context:
> https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html#trim-your-quotes-when-replying.
>
>

Alright. I will send v4 after the merge window closes. Thanks!