[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250730174506.60001-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 10:45:06 -0700
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Yueyang Pan <pyyjason@...il.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon: Move has filter to ops-common
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 10:19:55 -0700 Yueyang Pan <pyyjason@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch moves damon_pa_scheme_has_filter to ops-common. renaming
> to damon_scheme_has_filter.
> Doing so allows us to reuse its logic in the vaddr version
> of DAMOS_STAT
>
> Signed-off-by: Yueyang Pan <pyyjason@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/damon/ops-common.c | 9 +++++++++
> mm/damon/ops-common.h | 2 ++
> mm/damon/paddr.c | 11 +----------
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/ops-common.c b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> index 99321ff5cb92..3ebfa356ca46 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> @@ -412,3 +412,12 @@ unsigned long damon_migrate_pages(struct list_head *folio_list, int target_nid)
>
> return nr_migrated;
> }
> +
> +bool damon_scheme_has_filter(struct damos *s)
> +{
> + struct damos_filter *f;
> +
> + damos_for_each_ops_filter(f, s)
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
I should have tell this earlier, sorry. I now think it would be good to have
ops-common.c own prefix, since this namee makes me expect the function is on
DAMON core layer. Also, I use normal 'grep' and ctags at the best, and maybe
I'm not the only one that that lazy at learning new tools.
Following the weird and none-public naming convention we have on DAMON,
damos_ops_ for DAMOS-related functions and damon_ops_ for monitoring-related
functions would be the prefix for ops-common.c.
So, what about renaming this to damos_ops_has_filter() if we have a chance to
revision this once again?
> diff --git a/mm/damon/ops-common.h b/mm/damon/ops-common.h
> index 61ad54aaf256..8d5c5c7631ac 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/ops-common.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/ops-common.h
> @@ -21,3 +21,5 @@ int damon_hot_score(struct damon_ctx *c, struct damon_region *r,
>
> bool damos_folio_filter_match(struct damos_filter *filter, struct folio *folio);
> unsigned long damon_migrate_pages(struct list_head *folio_list, int target_nid);
> +
> +bool damon_scheme_has_filter(struct damos *s);
> diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> index 53a55c5114fb..daeceed981a0 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> @@ -262,22 +262,13 @@ static unsigned long damon_pa_migrate(struct damon_region *r, struct damos *s,
> return applied * PAGE_SIZE;
> }
>
> -static bool damon_pa_scheme_has_filter(struct damos *s)
> -{
> - struct damos_filter *f;
> -
> - damos_for_each_ops_filter(f, s)
> - return true;
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> static unsigned long damon_pa_stat(struct damon_region *r, struct damos *s,
> unsigned long *sz_filter_passed)
> {
> unsigned long addr;
> struct folio *folio;
>
> - if (!damon_pa_scheme_has_filter(s))
> + if (!damon_scheme_has_filter(s))
> return 0;
>
> addr = r->ar.start;
> --
> 2.47.3
Otherwise, all looks good to me.
Thanks,
SJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists