[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06f98711-7c09-4544-b832-b2a931907de8@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 11:10:23 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: yukuai@...nel.org, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, dlemoal@...nel.org,
hare@...e.de, jack@...e.cz, tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, yukuai3@...wei.com
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
johnny.chenyi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mq-deadline: switch to use elevator lock
On 7/30/25 11:01 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Ok, you mean that the lock is moved to the caller is functional change,
> right?
That's something one could argue about. But I think there is agreement
that each patch should only include one logical change.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists