[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAODwPW8ZXfMdFL2=6ht+BvQq5_LQkwHhQJT5j9DcseEx9naXxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 11:29:49 -0700
From: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
To: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@...il.com>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/20] dt-bindings: memory: introduce DDR4
> +title: DDR3 SDRAM compliant to JEDEC JESD79-4D
Should this say DDR4?
> +examples:
> + - |
> + ddr {
> + compatible = "ddr4-ff,f", "jedec,ddr4";
This is not a valid example for the way you're defining it now anymore.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists