[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78998e50-a20c-41de-a2b8-a467475210cf@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 15:57:54 +0530
From: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>,
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>, <bvanassche@....org>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <agross@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add reg and reg-names
On 30-Jul-25 2:41 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/07/2025 10:22, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> Update the Qualcomm UFS device tree bindings to support Multi-Circular
>> Queue (MCQ) operation. This includes increasing the maximum number of
>> register entries from 2 to 3 and extending the accepted values for
>> reg-names to include "mcq_sqd" and "mcq_vs".
>>
>> These changes are required to enable MCQ support via Device Tree for
>> platforms such as SM8650 and SM8750.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 21 ++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> index 6c6043d9809e..de263118b552 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> @@ -86,12 +86,17 @@ properties:
>>
>> reg:
>> minItems: 1
>> - maxItems: 2
>> + maxItems: 3
>>
>> reg-names:
>> - items:
>> - - const: std
>> - - const: ice
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - const: std
>> + - const: ice
>> + - items:
>> + - const: ufs_mem
>> + - const: mcq_sqd
>> + - const: mcq_vs
>
> This is incompatible change and commit msg is inaccurate here. It says
> "extending" but you are not extending at all.
>
> Recent qcom patches love to break ABI and impact users. No.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for your feedback.
Regarding your concern about this being an incompatible change — could you please clarify what specific aspect you believe breaks compatibility?
>From my side, I’ve carefully tested the patch and verified that it does not break any existing DTs. I ran the following command to validate against the schema:
make -j32 dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
make -j32 dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
There were no errors reported for any target DTB.
As for the commit message, I acknowledge your point and will revise it in the next patchset to more accurately reflect the nature of the change.
Best regards,
Ram.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists