[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <683553fc-3874-0c31-d317-03b28dc3431e@zhaoxin.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 23:21:51 +0800
From: "WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com" <WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <WeitaoWang@...oxin.com>, <wwt8723@....com>, <CobeChen@...oxin.com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb:xhci:Fix slot_id resource race conflict
On 2025/7/29 23:00, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>
> On 29.7.2025 20.25, WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com wrote:
>> On 2025/7/28 21:16, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25.7.2025 21.51, Weitao Wang wrote:
>>>> In such a scenario, device-A with slot_id equal to 1 is disconnecting
>>>> while device-B is enumerating, device-B will fail to enumerate in the
>>>> follow sequence.
>>>>
>>>> 1.[device-A] send disable slot command
>>>> 2.[device-B] send enable slot command
>>>> 3.[device-A] disable slot command completed and wakeup waiting thread
>>>> 4.[device-B] enable slot command completed with slot_id equal to 1 and
>>>> wakeup waiting thread
>>>> 5.[device-B] driver check this slot_id was used by someone(device-A) in
>>>> xhci_alloc_virt_device, this device fails to enumerate as this conflict
>>>> 6.[device-A] xhci->devs[slot_id] set to NULL in xhci_free_virt_device
>>>>
>>>> To fix driver's slot_id resources conflict, let the xhci_free_virt_device
>>>> functionm call in the interrupt handler when disable slot command success.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Fixes: 7faac1953ed1 ("xhci: avoid race between disable slot command and host runtime
>>>> suspend")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Weitao Wang <WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com>
>>>
>>> Nice catch, good to get this fixed.
>>>
>>> This however has the downside of doing a lot in interrupt context.
>>>
>>> what if we only clear some strategic pointers in the interrupt context,
>>> and then do all the actual unmapping and endpoint ring segments freeing,
>>> contexts freeing ,etc later?
>>>
>>> Pseudocode:
>>>
>>> xhci_handle_cmd_disable_slot(xhci, slot_id, comp_code)
>>> {
>>> if (cmd_comp_code == COMP_SUCCESS) {
>>> xhci->dcbaa->dev_context_ptrs[slot_id] = 0;
>>> xhci->devs[slot_id] = NULL;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> xhci_disable_and_free_slot(xhci, slot_id)
>>> {
>>> struct xhci_virt_device *vdev = xhci->devs[slot_id];
>>>
>>> xhci_disable_slot(xhci, slot_id);
>>> xhci_free_virt_device(xhci, vdev, slot_id);
>>> }
>>>
>>> xhci_free_virt_device(xhci, vdev, slot_id)
>>> {
>>> if (xhci->dcbaa->dev_context_ptrs[slot_id] == vdev->out_ctx->dma)
>>> xhci->dcbaa->dev_context_ptrs[slot_id] = 0;
>>>
>>> // free and unmap things just like before
>>> ...
>>>
>>> if (xhci->devs[slot_id] == vdev)
>>> xhci->devs[slot_id] = NULL;
>>>
>>> kfee(vdev);
>>> }
>>
>> Hi Mathias,
>>
>> Yes, your suggestion is a better revision, I made some modifications
>> to the patch which is listed below. Please help to review again.
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 9 +++++++--
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 3 ++-
>> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>> index 92bb84f8132a..b3a59ce1b3f4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>> @@ -704,8 +704,7 @@ static int xhci_enter_test_mode(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
>> if (!xhci->devs[i])
>> continue;
>>
>> - retval = xhci_disable_slot(xhci, i);
>> - xhci_free_virt_device(xhci, i);
>> + retval = xhci_disable_and_free_slot(xhci, i);
>> if (retval)
>> xhci_err(xhci, "Failed to disable slot %d, %d. Enter test mode anyway\n",
>> i, retval);
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
>> index 6680afa4f596..fc4aca2e65bc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
>> @@ -865,21 +865,18 @@ int xhci_alloc_tt_info(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
>> * will be manipulated by the configure endpoint, allocate device, or update
>> * hub functions while this function is removing the TT entries from the list.
>> */
>> -void xhci_free_virt_device(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, int slot_id)
>> +void xhci_free_virt_device(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_virt_device *dev,
>> + int slot_id)
>> {
>> - struct xhci_virt_device *dev;
>> int i;
>> int old_active_eps = 0;
>>
>> /* Slot ID 0 is reserved */
>> - if (slot_id == 0 || !xhci->devs[slot_id])
>> + if (slot_id == 0 || !dev)
>> return;
>>
>> - dev = xhci->devs[slot_id];
>> -
>> - xhci->dcbaa->dev_context_ptrs[slot_id] = 0;
>> - if (!dev)
>> - return;
>> + if (xhci->dcbaa->dev_context_ptrs[slot_id] == dev->out_ctx->dma)
>
> forgot that dev_context_ptrs[] values are stored as le64 while
> out_ctx->dma is in whatever cpu uses.
>
> So above should be:
> if (xhci->dcbaa->dev_context_ptrs[slot_id] == cpu_to_le64(dev->out_ctx->dma))
>
> Otherwise it looks good to me
Ok, I got it. I'll submit a new version with this issue fix.
Best Regards,
weitao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists