[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250730-dt-bindings-ufs-qcom-v1-0-4cec9ff202dc@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:35:35 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Split SC7280 and similar into
separate file
The binding for Qualcomm SoC UFS controllers grew and it will grow
further. It already includes several conditionals, partially for
difference in handling encryption block (ICE, either as phandle or as IO
address space) but it will further grow for MCQ.
See also: lore.kernel.org/r/20250730082229.23475-1-quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com
The question is whether SM8650 and SM8750 should have their own schemas,
but based on bindings above I think all devices here have MCQ?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
---
Krzysztof Kozlowski (2):
dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Split common part to qcom,ufs-common.yaml
dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Split SC7280 and similar
.../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7280-ufshc.yaml | 149 +++++++++++++++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs-common.yaml | 67 +++++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 160 +++++----------------
3 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: d7af19298454ed155f5cf67201a70f5cf836c842
change-id: 20250730-dt-bindings-ufs-qcom-980795ebd0aa
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists