lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9843578b-2adb-4f6f-b3c1-99dac003e2bf@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:04:22 +0300
From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...aro.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, tglx@...utronix.de, andersson@...nel.org,
 pmladek@...e.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
 corbet@....net, mojha@....qualcomm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
 jonechou@...gle.com, tudor.ambarus@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 16/29] mm/show_mem: Annotate static information
 into Kmemdump



On 7/30/25 16:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.07.25 15:54, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>> Annotate vital static information into kmemdump:
>>   - _totalram_pages
>>
>> Information on these variables is stored into dedicated kmemdump section.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   mm/show_mem.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/show_mem.c b/mm/show_mem.c
>> index 41999e94a56d..93a5dc041ae1 100644
>> --- a/mm/show_mem.c
>> +++ b/mm/show_mem.c
>> @@ -14,12 +14,14 @@
>>   #include <linux/mmzone.h>
>>   #include <linux/swap.h>
>>   #include <linux/vmstat.h>
>> +#include <linux/kmemdump.h>
>>   
>>   #include "internal.h"
>>   #include "swap.h"
>>   
>>   atomic_long_t _totalram_pages __read_mostly;
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(_totalram_pages);
>> +KMEMDUMP_VAR_CORE(_totalram_pages, sizeof(_totalram_pages));
> 
> Tagging these variables that way is really rather ... controversial.
> 
> As these are exported globals, isn't there a way to have a list of what 
> to include and what not somewhere else?
> 
> Not sure if any of that would win a beauty price, though.
> 

Annotating the variable was suggested here :

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87h61wn2qq.ffs@tglx/

It does not win a beauty prize but it's simple and efficient at least.
Do you think it would be better to gather all the annotations for the
globals in a single place ?

Eugen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ