[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACu1E7E6QaWgjFy13qP4BS_5mdhJ2vFVsnm9WtnJE3_t7rymPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:15:49 -0400
From: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@...il.com>
To: rob.clark@....qualcomm.com
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm/msm: Add missing "location"s to devcoredump
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 9:40 AM Rob Clark <rob.clark@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 3:15 PM Rob Clark <rob.clark@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 2:04 PM Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 4:43 PM Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is needed to properly interpret some of the sections.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> > > > index faca2a0243ab..e586577e90de 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> > > > @@ -1796,6 +1796,7 @@ static void a7xx_show_shader(struct a6xx_gpu_state_obj *obj,
> > > >
> > > > print_name(p, " - type: ", a7xx_statetype_names[block->statetype]);
> > > > print_name(p, " - pipe: ", a7xx_pipe_names[block->pipeid]);
> > > > + drm_printf(p, " - location: %d", block->location);
> > >
> > > We should probably at least try to keep it proper YAML by indenting
> > > everything after another level...
> >
> > this made me realize I missed a \n... but otherwise I think the indent
> > is correct? Or should location not have a leading '-'?
>
> beyond that, even without the added location field, some random online
> yaml checker is telling me that we were already not proper yaml.. so I
> guess, :shrug:?
>
> BR,
> -R
Before this change, it looked like this:
- pipe: A7XX_PIPE_BR
- cluster-name: A7XX_CLUSTER_SP_PS
- context: 3
- { offset: 0x02a718, value: 0x00000003 }
...
Notice that each nested thing (pipe -> cluster -> context) has an
additional level of indentation. Now, it looks like this:
- pipe: A7XX_PIPE_BR
- cluster-name: A7XX_CLUSTER_SP_PS
- context: 3
- location: 4
- { offset: 0x02a718, value: 0x00000003 }
...
So it looks a bit weird with the context and location not being
nested. Also, I think the correct nesting HW-wise is cluster ->
location -> context, rather than context-> location, so the location
should be first. But ultimately it's up to you.
Connor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists