[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC=S1ngvS9z-KOZXeV4kLiW_pDx2F+3AOMcTokaq9O=-E4Pneg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:03:14 +0800
From: Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
To: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
Cc: srini@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
lukasz.luba@....com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com,
kernel@...labora.com, nfraprado@...labora.com, arnd@...db.de,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, wenst@...omium.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, bchihi@...libre.com,
colin.i.king@...il.com, lala.lin@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] thermal: mediatek: lvts: Add platform ops to
support alternative conversion logic
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 11:35 PM Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce lvts_platform_ops struct to support SoC-specific versions of
> lvts_raw_to_temp() and lvts_temp_to_raw() conversion functions.
>
> This is in preparation for supporting SoCs like MT8196/MT6991, which
> require a different lvts_temp_to_raw() implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> index 8398af657ba2..6e4a35ecaf34 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,14 @@ struct lvts_ctrl_data {
> continue; \
> else
>
> +struct lvts_platform_ops {
> + int (*lvts_raw_to_temp)(u32 raw_temp, int temp_factor);
> + u32 (*lvts_temp_to_raw)(int temperature, int temp_factor);
> +};
> +
> struct lvts_data {
> const struct lvts_ctrl_data *lvts_ctrl;
> + struct lvts_platform_ops ops;
nit: I think this can also be a const struct, since ops are all
initialized in the platform data and never change.
Anyway, the changes look good IMO, so
Reviewed-by: Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
> const u32 *conn_cmd;
> const u32 *init_cmd;
> int num_cal_offsets;
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists