linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: fsl: fsl,rcpm: Add #power-domain-cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250731-funky-crab-of-defense-7cd658@kuoka>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:32:57 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: fsl: fsl,rcpm: Add
 #power-domain-cells

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 07:58:04AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> dtbs_check for ls1021.dtsi warns about unsupported property:
>  power-controller@...2140 (fsl,ls1021a-rcpm): '#power-domain-cells' does not match any of the regexes: '^pinctrl-[0-9]+$'
> 
> But if removed the check warns about missing property:
>  power-controller@...2140 (fsl,ls1021a-rcpm): '#power-domain-cells' is a required property


And if any other warning says something, are you going to do that as
well?

> 
> Given commit 8bcf67b8d893b ("ARM: dts: ls1021a: add #power-domain-cells
> for power-controller node") explicitly added that property, add it
> to the expected property list as well.

No, commit does not explain why! It's one of this NXP commits without
explanation, doing random things.

No, explain why do you think this is a power domain provider - fast
look told me that it is NOT.

Best regards,
Krzysztof