linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Split SC7280 and similar into separate file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250731-agile-sepia-raccoon-c40caa@kuoka>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:55:58 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>, 
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, 
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
	Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Split SC7280 and similar
 into separate file

On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 04:25:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/07/2025 15:53, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 7/30/2025 6:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> The binding for Qualcomm SoC UFS controllers grew and it will grow
> >> further.  It already includes several conditionals, partially for
> >> difference in handling encryption block (ICE, either as phandle or as IO
> >> address space) but it will further grow for MCQ.
> >>
> >> See also: lore.kernel.org/r/20250730082229.23475-1-quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com
> >>
> >> The question is whether SM8650 and SM8750 should have their own schemas,
> >> but based on bindings above I think all devices here have MCQ?
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > If I understand correctly, you're splitting the YAML files based on MCQ 
> > (Multi-Circular Queue) support:
> 
> Not entirely, I don't know which devices support MCQ. I split based on
> common parts in the binding.

I found the docs, so I'll send v2 with MCQ also separated.

Best regards,
Krzysztof