lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bac5390f-725a-43db-a2b6-17a68d0d733c@tuxon.dev>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 11:05:07 +0300
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
 nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
 catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, olivia@...enic.com,
 herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, andi.shyti@...nel.org,
 lee@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
 jirislaby@...nel.org, arnd@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
 dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
 o.rempel@...gutronix.de, daniel.machon@...rochip.com,
 Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Cc: luka.perkov@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v8 00/10] arm64: lan969x: Add support for
 Microchip LAN969x SoC

Hi, Vinod,

On 23.07.2025 15:29, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 20:35:58 +0200, Robert Marko wrote:
>> This patch series adds basic support for Microchip LAN969x SoC.
>>
>> It introduces the SoC ARCH symbol itself under the ARCH_MICROCHIP symbol
>> which allows to avoid the need to change dependencies of the drivers that
>> are shared for Microchip SoC-s in the future.
>>
>> DTS and further driver will be added in follow-up series.
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [08/10] dma: xdmac: make it selectable for ARCH_MICROCHIP
>         commit: e56982021f5303b2523ac247e3c79b063459d012

As this one depends, as well, on the first 3 patches in the series (Robert,
please correct me if I'm wrong), and there are still discussions ongoing,
can you please drop it until all is clear on the first 3 patches?

Otherwise, applying only this patch will lead to AT91 XDMAC driver not
being built for SAMA5{D2, D3, D4}, SAMA7{G5, D65} SoCs. Linux is not
booting on SAMA7G5 SoC only with this patch applied.

Thank you,
Claudiu


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ