[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250731084123.GA22919@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 10:41:23 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: fix error return value of clock_nanosleep()
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:00:31AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> clock_nanosleep() returns a positive error value. Unlike other libc
> functions it *does not* return -1 nor set errno.
>
> Fix the return value and also adapt nanosleep().
Good catch, I wasn't aware of this either!
> Fixes: 7c02bc4088af ("tools/nolibc: add support for clock_nanosleep() and nanosleep()")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists