[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PN3P287MB35195D0D5B5EE972B885F189FF27A@PN3P287MB3519.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:56:00 +0000
From: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@...iconsignals.io>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com" <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com" <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
"kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com" <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>, Himanshu
Bhavani <himanshu.bhavani@...iconsignals.io>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>, Bryan O'Donoghue
<bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
André Apitzsch <git@...tzsch.eu>, Matthias Fend
<matthias.fend@...end.at>, Tarang Raval <tarang.raval@...iconsignals.io>,
Heimir Thor Sverrisson <heimir.sverrisson@...il.com>, Jingjing Xiong
<jingjing.xiong@...el.com>, Dongcheng Yan <dongcheng.yan@...el.com>, Benjamin
Mugnier <benjamin.mugnier@...s.st.com>, Sylvain Petinot
<sylvain.petinot@...s.st.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: media: i2c: Add ov2735 sensor
> On 31/07/2025 09:10, Hardevsinh Palaniya wrote:
> >
> > Apologies for repeatedly disagreeing earlier. In your previous response, it
> > was a little hard to understand that you were saying the property is already
> > there and being duplicated.
>
>
> "Otherwise this is redundant - validates nothing, changes nothing, does
> not make the code more obvious."
>
> If code changes nothing, it means it is safe to be removed, because it
> has 0 impact.
Thanks, now I understand your point more clearly
Best Regards,
Hardev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists