[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5En_Yxy1BoWWTsQPSLYCqvd0_r-JCtEByan9xNU0QLmDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 17:10:21 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
Cc: srini@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
lukasz.luba@....com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, nfraprado@...labora.com,
arnd@...db.de, colin.i.king@...il.com, u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com,
andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com, lala.lin@...iatek.com, bchihi@...libre.com,
frank-w@...lic-files.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: Add
lvts_temp_to_raw variant
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 11:22 PM Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> MT8196/MT6991 require a different version of lvts_temp_to_raw(),
> specifically the multiplicative inverse of the existing implementation.
> Introduce a variant of the function with inverted calculation logic to
> match this requirement.
>
> This ensures accurate raw value generation for temperature
> thresholds, avoiding spurious thermal interrupts or unintended hardware
> resets on MT8196/MT6991.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists