[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250731074316.01372681@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 07:43:16 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu
Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Memory Management List
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Have eprobes have their own config
option
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 07:08:36 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I still have the trace/for-next to push (I've finished testing your last
> > "attribute" patch and now I'm just letting it simmer in linux-next before
> > doing the pull request). I can still add this to that one if you want.
> >
>
> OK, could you push this to Linus?
Will do later today.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists