[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250731120454.GA309@bytedance>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:04:54 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@...edance.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: Use correct limit for wd-cs-wd read back delay
in printing
With commit 4ac1dd3245b9("clocksource: Set cs_watchdog_read() checks
based on .uncertainty_margin"), the limit for wd-cs-wd read back delay
is changed from the static WATCHDOG_MAX_SKEW to dynamic ones based on
watchdog and cs' uncertainty_margin, but WATCHDOG_MAX_SKEW is still used
when dumping information.
Fix this by using the actual limit: md(2 * watchdog->uncertainty_margin)
+ cs->unvertainty_margin.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@...edance.com>
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index e400fe150f9d7..ae0fcd5af41c2 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static enum wd_read_status cs_watchdog_read(struct clocksource *cs, u64 *csnow,
}
pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: wd-%s-wd excessive read-back delay of %lldns vs. limit of %ldns, wd-wd read-back delay only %lldns, attempt %d, marking %s unstable\n",
- smp_processor_id(), cs->name, wd_delay, WATCHDOG_MAX_SKEW, wd_seq_delay, nretries, cs->name);
+ smp_processor_id(), cs->name, wd_delay, md + cs->uncertainty_margin, wd_seq_delay, nretries, cs->name);
return WD_READ_UNSTABLE;
skip_test:
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists