linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with the modules tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f54da1b-0670-4f6f-b170-228ff90e624e@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 14:05:23 +0200
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Luis Chamberlain
	<mcgrof@...nel.org>, Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Sami Tolvanen
	<samitolvanen@...gle.com>
CC: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing
	List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Weißschuh
	<thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with the modules
 tree

On 7/31/2025 3:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:59:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the sysctl tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   include/linux/module.h
>>
>> between commits:
>>
>>   6633d3a45a8c ("module: move 'struct module_use' to internal.h")
>>   a55842991352 ("module: make structure definitions always visible")
>>
>> from the modules tree and commit:
>>
>>   6bb37af62634 ("module: Move modprobe_path and modules_disabled ctl_tables into the module subsys")
>>
>> from the sysctl tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
>>
>> diff --cc include/linux/module.h
>> index 3b665cb0cabe,e93cdb92ad92..000000000000
>> --- a/include/linux/module.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
>> @@@ -584,17 -608,6 +584,16 @@@ struct module 
>>   #define MODULE_ARCH_INIT {}
>>   #endif
>>   
>>  +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>>  +
>> - extern int modules_disabled; /* for sysctl */
>>  +/* Get/put a kernel symbol (calls must be symmetric) */
>>  +void *__symbol_get(const char *symbol);
>>  +void *__symbol_get_gpl(const char *symbol);
>>  +#define symbol_get(x)	({ \
>>  +	static const char __notrim[] \
>>  +		__used __section(".no_trim_symbol") = __stringify(x); \
>>  +	(typeof(&x))(__symbol_get(__stringify(x))); })
>>  +
>>   #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_KALLSYMS_SYMBOL_VALUE
>>   static inline unsigned long kallsyms_symbol_value(const Elf_Sym *sym)
>>   {
> 
> This is now a conflict between the modules tree and Linus' tree.

Thanks for the heads-up.

modules tree is now rebased on top of Linus's tree with the conflict
solved.