lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250731151919.212829-2-surenb@google.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:19:19 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: jannh@...gle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, 
	vbabka@...e.cz, pfalcato@...e.de, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, surenb@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: change vma_start_read() to drop RCU lock on failure

vma_start_read() can drop and reacquire RCU lock in certain failure
cases. It's not apparent that the RCU session started by the caller of
this function might be interrupted when vma_start_read() fails to lock
the vma. This might become a source of subtle bugs and to prevent that
we change the locking rules for vma_start_read() to drop RCU read lock
upon failure. This way it's more obvious that RCU-protected objects are
unsafe after vma locking fails.

Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
---
Changes since v1 [1]:
- Fixed missing RCU unlock in lock_vma_under_rcu(), per Lorenzo Stoakes
- Modified comments, per Lorenzo Stoakes

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250731013405.4066346-2-surenb@google.com/

 mm/mmap_lock.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmap_lock.c b/mm/mmap_lock.c
index 10826f347a9f..7ea603f26975 100644
--- a/mm/mmap_lock.c
+++ b/mm/mmap_lock.c
@@ -136,15 +136,16 @@ void vma_mark_detached(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  * Returns the vma on success, NULL on failure to lock and EAGAIN if vma got
  * detached.
  *
- * WARNING! The vma passed to this function cannot be used if the function
- * fails to lock it because in certain cases RCU lock is dropped and then
- * reacquired. Once RCU lock is dropped the vma can be concurently freed.
+ * IMPORTANT: RCU lock must be held upon entering the function, but upon error
+ *            IT IS RELEASED. The caller must handle this correctly.
  */
 static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm,
 						    struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
+	struct mm_struct *other_mm;
 	int oldcnt;
 
+	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held(), "no rcu lock held");
 	/*
 	 * Check before locking. A race might cause false locked result.
 	 * We can use READ_ONCE() for the mm_lock_seq here, and don't need
@@ -152,8 +153,10 @@ static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	 * we don't rely on for anything - the mm_lock_seq read against which we
 	 * need ordering is below.
 	 */
-	if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq) == READ_ONCE(mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence))
-		return NULL;
+	if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq) == READ_ONCE(mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence)) {
+		vma = NULL;
+		goto err;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If VMA_LOCK_OFFSET is set, __refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire()
@@ -164,34 +167,14 @@ static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	if (unlikely(!__refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire(&vma->vm_refcnt, &oldcnt,
 							      VMA_REF_LIMIT))) {
 		/* return EAGAIN if vma got detached from under us */
-		return oldcnt ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
+		vma = oldcnt ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	rwsem_acquire_read(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
 
-	/*
-	 * If vma got attached to another mm from under us, that mm is not
-	 * stable and can be freed in the narrow window after vma->vm_refcnt
-	 * is dropped and before rcuwait_wake_up(mm) is called. Grab it before
-	 * releasing vma->vm_refcnt.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(vma->vm_mm != mm)) {
-		/* Use a copy of vm_mm in case vma is freed after we drop vm_refcnt */
-		struct mm_struct *other_mm = vma->vm_mm;
-
-		/*
-		 * __mmdrop() is a heavy operation and we don't need RCU
-		 * protection here. Release RCU lock during these operations.
-		 * We reinstate the RCU read lock as the caller expects it to
-		 * be held when this function returns even on error.
-		 */
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		mmgrab(other_mm);
-		vma_refcount_put(vma);
-		mmdrop(other_mm);
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		return NULL;
-	}
+	if (unlikely(vma->vm_mm != mm))
+		goto err_unstable;
 
 	/*
 	 * Overflow of vm_lock_seq/mm_lock_seq might produce false locked result.
@@ -206,10 +189,31 @@ static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(vma->vm_lock_seq == raw_read_seqcount(&mm->mm_lock_seq))) {
 		vma_refcount_put(vma);
-		return NULL;
+		vma = NULL;
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	return vma;
+err:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return vma;
+err_unstable:
+	/*
+	 * If vma got attached to another mm from under us, that mm is not
+	 * stable and can be freed in the narrow window after vma->vm_refcnt
+	 * is dropped and before rcuwait_wake_up(mm) is called. Grab it before
+	 * releasing vma->vm_refcnt.
+	 */
+	other_mm = vma->vm_mm; /* use a copy as vma can be freed after we drop vm_refcnt */
+
+	/* __mmdrop() is a heavy operation, do it after dropping RCU lock. */
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	mmgrab(other_mm);
+	vma_refcount_put(vma);
+	mmdrop(other_mm);
+
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -223,11 +227,13 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	MA_STATE(mas, &mm->mm_mt, address, address);
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 retry:
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	vma = mas_walk(&mas);
-	if (!vma)
+	if (!vma) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		goto inval;
+	}
 
 	vma = vma_start_read(mm, vma);
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(vma)) {
@@ -241,6 +247,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		/* Failed to lock the VMA */
 		goto inval;
 	}
+
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	/*
 	 * At this point, we have a stable reference to a VMA: The VMA is
 	 * locked and we know it hasn't already been isolated.
@@ -249,16 +258,14 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	 */
 
 	/* Check if the vma we locked is the right one. */
-	if (unlikely(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end))
-		goto inval_end_read;
+	if (unlikely(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end)) {
+		vma_end_read(vma);
+		goto inval;
+	}
 
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return vma;
 
-inval_end_read:
-	vma_end_read(vma);
 inval:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_ABORT);
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -313,6 +320,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_next_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		 */
 		if (PTR_ERR(vma) == -EAGAIN) {
 			/* reset to search from the last address */
+			rcu_read_lock();
 			vma_iter_set(vmi, from_addr);
 			goto retry;
 		}
@@ -342,9 +350,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_next_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	return vma;
 
 fallback_unlock:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	vma_end_read(vma);
 fallback:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	vma = lock_next_vma_under_mmap_lock(mm, vmi, from_addr);
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	/* Reinitialize the iterator after re-entering rcu read section */
-- 
2.50.1.552.g942d659e1b-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ