lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175407203870.139709.8000597693697838500.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 19:13:58 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Simon Trimmer <simont@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cs42l43: Property entry should be a
 null-terminated array

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:01:09 +0000, Simon Trimmer wrote:
> The software node does not specify a count of property entries, so the
> array must be null-terminated.
> 
> When unterminated, this can lead to a fault in the downstream cs35l56
> amplifier driver, because the node parse walks off the end of the
> array into unknown memory.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: cs42l43: Property entry should be a null-terminated array
      commit: a735ee58c0d673d630a10ac2939dccb54df0622a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ