linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] media: atomisp: Fix incorrect snprintf format specifiers for signed integers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VeDt=1=9epJPQjzfyyph09bov9UWWwpaAXgu01Egf1hag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 23:57:43 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>, 
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] media: atomisp: Fix incorrect snprintf format
 specifiers for signed integers

On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 6:01 PM Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There are incorrect %u format specifiers being used to for signed integers,
> fix this by using %d instead.

Both of them sound to me like the fix of the symptom and not the
cause. Can we simply make types of the iterators to be unsigned
instead?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko