[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIw-P6zkQSOhvYJW@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 06:10:39 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] watchdog: rzv2h: Set min_timeout based on
max_hw_heartbeat_ms
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 04:59:13PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Update the watchdog minimum timeout value to be derived from
> `max_hw_heartbeat_ms` using `DIV_ROUND_UP()` to ensure a valid and
> consistent minimum timeout in seconds.
I don't understand this change. Why is the _minimum_ timeout based on
the _maximum_ heartbeat?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists