lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250801044340.6ycskhhkzenkzt7a@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 10:13:40 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...gle.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>,
	Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	z00813676 <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, sudeep.holla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs

On 31-07-25, 22:23, Beata Michalska wrote:
> The reason why I mentioned that is that getting current frequency
> for an idle CPU seems like smth we could potentially optimise away and save some
> cycles (fixing other problems on the way, like this one).

I agree with that idea, just that the cpufreq core may not be the right place
for that. Doing that in the driver should be fine.

> But if that's undesired for any reason, it's perfectly fine to stay with

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ