[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f95e865-ee09-4ddd-b6db-f2092f0d4b10@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 09:14:58 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Sudarsan Mahendran <sudarsanm@...gle.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: pass filename as input param to VM_PFNMAP
tests
On 31.07.25 22:10, Sudarsan Mahendran wrote:
> Enable these tests to be run on other pfnmap'ed memory like
> NVIDIA's EGM.
>
> Add '--' as a separator to pass in file path. This allows
> passing of cmd line arguments to kselftest_harness.
> Use '/dev/mem' as default filename.
>
> Existing test passes:
> pfnmap
> TAP version 13
> 1..6
> # Starting 6 tests from 1 test cases.
> # PASSED: 6 / 6 tests passed.
> # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Pass params to kselftest_harness:
> pfnmap -r pfnmap:mremap_fixed
> TAP version 13
> 1..1
> # Starting 1 tests from 1 test cases.
> # RUN pfnmap.mremap_fixed ...
> # OK pfnmap.mremap_fixed
> ok 1 pfnmap.mremap_fixed
> # PASSED: 1 / 1 tests passed.
> # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Pass random file name as input:
> pfnmap -- /dev/blah
> TAP version 13
> 1..6
> # Starting 6 tests from 1 test cases.
> # RUN pfnmap.madvise_disallowed ...
> # SKIP Cannot open '/dev/blah'
Now, if you really just pass a random *actual file* that exists, the
test case will not actually test what we want.
Unless you have a way to verify that you actually get a PFNMAP mapping,
this extension is questionable. It will make the test report possibly
wrong results when wrong files are provided.
I think we can test whether we get a PFNMAP mapping by looking at the
flags in smaps output ("pf" in flags), so I would expect such a test to
be done in pfnmap, and the test should FAIL if the file would not create
a PFNMAP.
But more importantly, we rely on "/proc/iomem" to find a RAM target in
/dev/mem. That doesn't make any sense with what you are doing here.
If we are not provided /dev/mem, you should probably try mapping offset
0 of the file.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists