linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: validate commit tag ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3e9106d35d41a044adeadffeea32fa096c9e1370@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 10:55:55 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven
 <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Hendrik Hamerlinck <hendrik.hamerlinck@...mernet.be>,
 dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, joe@...ches.com,
 corbet@....net, apw@...onical.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
 linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Konstantin
 Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: validate commit tag ordering

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 31/07/2025 13:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> B4 does not follow the proper order:
>
> There is no "proper order" in terms of absolute facts.

Let's just decide whatever order b4 uses *is* the proper order, and save
ourselves endless hours of debating! :p

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel