[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250801-gic-v5-fixes-6-17-v1-3-4fcedaccf9e6@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:58:20 +0200
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@....com>,
Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Remove IRQD_RESEND_WHEN_IN_PROGRESS
for ITS IRQs
GICv5 LPI interrupts have an active state hence they cannot retrigger
while the IRQ is being handled.
Therefore setting IRQD_RESEND_WHEN_IN_PROGRESS for GICv5 ITS
interrupts provides no benefit and it is useless (and confusing),
it solves an issue that cannot happen.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
index 340640fdbdf6..9290ac741949 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
@@ -973,7 +973,6 @@ static int gicv5_its_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int vi
irqd = irq_get_irq_data(virq + i);
irqd_set_single_target(irqd);
irqd_set_affinity_on_activate(irqd);
- irqd_set_resend_when_in_progress(irqd);
}
return 0;
--
2.48.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists