[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=P0zXVOBgfWU7cec4wDiXoV_jUtVR8vANT0M5=pcaYRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 14:19:28 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust: time: Implement basic arithmetic operations for Delta
On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 12:10 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> #[cfg(target_pointer_width = "32")]
> or
> #[cfg(target_pointer_width = "64")]
These are in other proposed series, and in-tree we also have a couple
`target_arch`s, but I keep wondering about the familiarity of using
these vs. `CONFIG_*`s. I guess it is fine.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists