[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bjoz6t80.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 15:56:31 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Lukasz
Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: Convert marvell,armada370-thermal
to DT schema
Hi Rob,
On 02/07/2025 at 17:55:27 -05, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> Convert the Marvell Armada 3xx/XP thermal binding to schema.
>
> Drop the AP80x and CP110 as they have long been deprecated and have
> been replaced by a new binding.
Totally fine with that, but then I would go even further and also drop
the legacy binding implying a size of 4 on the second reg range?
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
...
> +examples:
> + - |
> + thermal@...18300 {
> + compatible = "marvell,armada370-thermal";
> + reg = <0xd0018300 0x4
> + 0xd0018304 0x4>;
> + };
This example is showing a legacy binding. Even if we decide to keep
supporting it, I think you would prefer to replace the second line:
reg = <0xd0018300 0x4
- 0xd0018304 0x4>;
+ 0xd0018304 0x8>;
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists