linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched_ext: Provide scx_bpf_remote

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aIzTcxGC6_5Ntm18@gpd4>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 16:47:15 +0200
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev, tj@...nel.org,
	void@...ifault.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched_ext: Provide scx_bpf_remote_curr()

On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:17:40PM +0100, Christian Loehle wrote:
> Provide scx_bpf_remote_curr() as a way for scx schedulers to
> check the curr task of a remote rq, without assuming its lock
> or acquiring any.
> 
> Many scx schedulers make use of scx_bpf_cpu_rq() to check a
> remote curr (e.g. to see if it should be preempted). This is
> problematic because scx_bpf_cpu_rq() provides access to all
> fields of struct rq, most of which aren't safe to use without
> holding the associated rq lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/ext.c                       | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  tools/sched_ext/include/scx/common.bpf.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index b734f55f3318..92e66bb0b5f2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -7436,6 +7436,20 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct rq *scx_bpf_cpu_rq(s32 cpu)
>  	return cpu_rq(cpu);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * scx_bpf_remote_curr - Fetch the curr of a rq without acquiring its rq lock
> + * @cpu: CPU of the rq
> + *
> + * Neither a rq lock nor a task reference is acquired.
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *scx_bpf_remote_curr(s32 cpu)
> +{
> +	if (!kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return cpu_rq(cpu)->curr;
> +}

As mentioned in my previou comment, this should be something like:

 if (!kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
 	return NULL;

 rcu_read_lock();
 p = cpu_rq(cpu)->curr;
 if (p)
 	p = bpf_task_acquire(p);
 rcu_read_unlock();

 return p;

We may still race with CPU hotplugging, but I think it's not always
possible to use cpus_read_lock/unlock() here. Also, most of the scx
schedulers are restarted on CPU hotplugging events, so... one thing at a
time. :)

> +
>  /**
>   * scx_bpf_task_cgroup - Return the sched cgroup of a task
>   * @p: task of interest
> @@ -7600,6 +7614,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_put_cpumask, KF_RELEASE)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_task_running, KF_RCU)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_task_cpu, KF_RCU)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_cpu_rq, KF_RET_NULL)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_remote_curr, KF_RET_NULL)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_task_cgroup, KF_RCU | KF_ACQUIRE)
>  #endif
> diff --git a/tools/sched_ext/include/scx/common.bpf.h b/tools/sched_ext/include/scx/common.bpf.h
> index d4e21558e982..e5d4ef124532 100644
> --- a/tools/sched_ext/include/scx/common.bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/sched_ext/include/scx/common.bpf.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ s32 scx_bpf_pick_any_cpu(const cpumask_t *cpus_allowed, u64 flags) __ksym;
>  bool scx_bpf_task_running(const struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
>  s32 scx_bpf_task_cpu(const struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
>  struct rq *scx_bpf_cpu_rq(s32 cpu) __ksym;
> +struct task_struct *scx_bpf_remote_curr(s32 cpu) __ksym;
>  struct cgroup *scx_bpf_task_cgroup(struct task_struct *p) __ksym __weak;
>  u64 scx_bpf_now(void) __ksym __weak;
>  void scx_bpf_events(struct scx_event_stats *events, size_t events__sz) __ksym __weak;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-Andrea